Supreme Court rules roof replacement company must pay £2.5 million VAT bill
A roof replacement company has been hit with a £2.5 million tax bill after a ruling that the insulated roof panels it supplied did not qualify for a VAT-reduced rating.
Greenspace (UK) Ltd supplied the roof panels to residential customers, which were fitted onto existing conservatory roofs.
But after First Tier Tribunal (FTT) and Upper Tribunal (UT) rulings, the Court of Appeal confirmed that the roof panels were not eligible for a VAT-reduced rating.
The FTT had rejected Greenspace’s appeal on the basis that their supplies could not be treated as anything other than a new roof or part of a roof. This was later upheld at the UT.
Energy saving
In the Court of Appeal, Greenspace argued that the panels were the supply of insulation for a roof or something more extensive, namely the installation of the roof itself.
The company had charged customers VAT at the reduced rate of five per cent on the basis that the supply was one of insulation for roofs and therefore ‘energy-saving materials’ under section 7A Value Added Tax Act 1994 (VATA).
However, HMRC assessed those supplies to be taxable at the standard rate of VAT and raised a VAT assessment on 17 June 2020 of £2,581,092 for the periods of December 2017 to December 2019.
Reduced rate
The company had argued that the reduced rate of VAT applied to the installation of ‘energy-saving materials’, which includes ‘insulation for roofs’.
Although the Court of Appeal held that while the panels did provide insulation when they were installed, they also protected the roof from the outside elements, which the court believed was something more than a supply of insulation for roofs.
The Court found that Greenspace was not supplying insulation for roofs (although the panels have insulating properties, they also have other characteristics), and accordingly the reduced rate of VAT did not apply.
Need advice on VAT payments and other tax matters? Contact us today.
Social
Recent Posts
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
Categories
- Accountancy
- Accounting
- Apprentices
- Asset and Wealth Management
- Ben Allen
- Blog
- Blogs
- Bookkeeping
- Brexit
- Budget
- Business
- Business Advice
- Business Advice News
- Business Blog
- Business News
- Business Start-ups
- Capital Allowances
- Cash Flow
- Cash flow management
- Charities
- Corporate Tax
- Corporation Tax
- Covid-19 Home working and expenses
- Economy
- Employees
- Employment
- Employment and payroll
- Family Businesses
- Finance
- Financial News
- Financial Planning
- Fraud
- Funding
- Government Funding
- Grants
- Guide
- HMRC
- Home working and expenses
- Income Tax
- Inflation
- Inflation / Interest Rates
- Inheritance
- Insurance
- Investment
- Latest Business News
- Latest News
- Legal
- leisure and hospitality
- Loans
- Making Tax Digital
- Money
- MTD
- News
- PAYE
- Payroll
- Pension
- Pensions
- Personal Tax
- Personal taxes and finances
- Property
- Property News
- R&D
- Redundancy
- Scam
- Self Assessment
- Self Employed
- SME
- SMEs
- SMEs / Business
- Start ups
- Tax
- Tax Blog
- Tax News
- Tax Planning
- Tourism
- Uncategorized
- VAT
- VAT and MTD
- VAT deferral
- Wages
- Wealth Management